|
Marketing
Resource Management
“It
drives marketers crazy when a salesperson or channel partner takes
something done by Marketing, changes it and creates their own content,”
says Bryan Bogensberger.
That’s
the tip of a massive iceberg currently hobbling many marketing programs.
That iceberg has created a wave for companies like Bogensberger’s
to ride. A former marketer himself, Bogensberger, now president
of MarketingIsland.com, a marketing resource management (MRM) solution
provider, regularly analyzes chronic pain points in myriad marketing
organizations.
“People
may produce their own marketing materials that don’t match brand
guidelines established by Marketing,” Bogensberger says. “It gets
as bad as salespeople changing colours on the logos of companies
that have been around for 100 years.”
For
example, a national real estate firm rebranded 5 years ago, and
wanted to safeguard their creative and strategic efforts – in other
words, to ensure brand consistency. In the past, 500 versions of
business cards served 300 brokers. “Some had 2 or 3 different business
cards depending on who they saw,” Bogensberger recalls.
Who’s
to blame? “People in the field might not be armed with the right
tools,” says Bogensberger , “or they don’t know how to get them.”
As a result, they source materials themselves, risking brand equity
along the way.
A
lack of support to salespeople and retailers is a problem Bogensberger
sees almost everywhere he looks. “Ten to 20 per cent of retail outlets
don’t get the materials that they need when a program is launched,”
he figures.
During
a marketing diagnostic for a leading telco, for example, Bogensberger
found that many dealers across Canada did not receive in-store marketing
materials that they were supposed to get. He blames debacles like
this on a lack of profiles for each individual store. In addition,
“The logistics behind printing, kitting, distribution, delivery,
and receipt acknowledgement is complicated,” he says, adding that
Marketing has few tools to handle distribution.
Problems
aren’t limited to the link between marketing and the sales channels.
“Many CFOs see Marketing as a financial black hole,” says Bogensberger.
“They don’t know what happens. When ad hoc processes dominate the
financial management of marketing, no visibility exists.”
Purchasing
provides a common example. In typical systems, P.O.s should precede
invoices. Yet P.O.s can sometimes show up after the invoice. “Some
clients,” Bogensberger says, “say that the only reason they’re implementing
MRM is to make sure purchase orders are cut before marketing materials
show up.”
Several
marketing VPs have told Bogensberger that the financial aspect is
the most contentious in managing Marketing. They don’t know where
they are against plan or what P.O.s are open. They loathe spending
hours each month to determine accounting accruals.
Approvals,
an often nebulous process, typically causes one of two results:
“Either people ignore the rules or the process causes pain,” Bogensberger
says.
More
subtle, but no less painful, is the process itself. Process drags
marketers away from strategy and into tactical. “You’re hiring people
to develop the next great strategy,” notes Bogensberger . “Meanwhile,
they’re busy signing invoices, running spreadsheets to track spending,
doing accruals, getting quotes from suppliers... They become administrators
and buyers and bookkeepers and clerks.”
Even
partial MRM solutions don’t always help. Not all systems link to
Finance or follow established workflows or business rules. At one
bank, a fax arrives weekly at each branch, somebody writes what
the branch wants, and sends it back. Somewhere, there’s one person
whose sole responsibility is to pick up the faxes, arrange shipping,
accounting, and so forth.
Bogensberger
isn’t surprised: “There’s usually somebody behind the scenes cranking
the wheel.”
One
senior-level marketer lets invoices to be approved sit on his desk
for three or four weeks because he hasn’t got the time to deal with
them.
“It
takes plenty of time out of a very well-paid person’s life,” says
Bogensberger.
Perhaps
the worst aspect of ad-hoc systems is that individuals often own
the process. “The company should own the process,” says Bogensberger.
“When people leave, the knowledge of how to do something shouldn’t
walk out the door as well.”
Power
marketers, like advertising agencies, may run 50 programs at once.
The attendant details quickly overwhelm. “Each one of those programs
has a budget, many GL codes that can change daily,” says Bogensberger.
“An MRM system provides the visibility marketers need to properly
manage their programs’ operations.” Dashboards, for instance, show
power users information like total numbers, spend by program, by
GL code, open P.O.s, and so forth, from one central information
portal.
Can
MRM provide the fixes marketing needs? One marketing VP told Bogensberger
that some entry-level marketers define themselves as buyers. They
welcome reps, get golf shirts, and so on. This isn’t surprising,
since up to 75 per cent of what they do can be done by MRM instead.
The
VP looks forward to letting his people be marketers instead of clerks.
Originally
published here
Top |